Proposal to amend the BK regulation

    Updating the BK regulation in order to prohibits a member of the support team from playing alongside players (for a particular parties) 25

    1. Yes, I agree (21) 84%
    2. No, it is not the case (4) 16%

    The goal is to update the Battleknight game rules and add a provision that prohibits a member of the support team from playing alongside players, regardless of server or country (the only potential exception being while performing necessary checks for the function he holds). Once a member of the support team has decided to choose a side to play for, it is evident that parties will gain a significant advantage because the support team member can tell them anything as it is right now, with no duties under the regulations (as is already happening on S24 Ro). It is a significant conflict of interest, and after spending a lot of money, I have no choice but to stand and witness this type of situation.


    So, if you agree with me, please separate the functions in this game and play it as intended. In this regard, please vote so that the team that conducts the game realizes that they have a large problem and that they can easily manage it by updating the regulations.

    Quote from Undecim (Eleven)

    The goal is to update the Battleknight game rules and add a provision that prohibits a member of the support team from playing alongside players, regardless of server or country (the only potential exception being while performing necessary checks for the function he holds). Once a member of the support team has decided to choose a side to play for, it is evident that parties will gain a significant advantage because the support team member can tell them anything as it is right now, with no duties under the regulations (as is already happening on S24 Ro). It is a significant conflict of interest, and after spending a lot of money, I have no choice but to stand and witness this type of situation.


    So, if you agree with me, please separate the functions in this game and play it as intended. In this regard, please vote so that the team that conducts the game realizes that they have a large problem and that they can easily manage it by updating the regulations.


    Sure "Undecim (Eleven)", you spent money buying an account and now you're frustrated that you're not being allowed to operate without any limitation even though the bans your friends received came from COMA, not from the S24 admin you're targeting.


    Among the actions documented by your own group members from their own WhatsApp group messages are, but are not limited to: use of scripts, bots, VPNs, multiple undeclared accounts, and blocking a massive castle using phantom orders to prevent it from being attacked. The list goes on.


    So go away with your frustrations elsewhere!

    Das Anliegen verstehe ich sehr wohl. Allerdings gibt es da ein grosses Problem. Die Gameforge hat keine hauptberuflichen GO. Alle Teamler, egal ob hier im Forum oder die zuständigen für die Server, sind Spieler, die gegen ein paar Rubine die Arbeit erledigen.


    Vor den ganzen Serverfusionen war einmal die Regel, dass ein GameOperator nicht für den Server zuständig sein durfte, auf dem er selbst spielte. Wenn man nun aber alle Server einer nationalen Community zusammenlegt, wie soll sich dann überhaupt ein GO finden? Wollt Ihr dem dann verbieten weiterzuspielen?


    Und somit kommt ein Teamler automatisch in Gewissenskonflikte. Man müsste schon sehr schizophren sein, wenn man sein eigenes Spiel 100% ausblenden könnte. Somit mache ich den Teamlern keinen Vorwurf.


    Die Abstimmung müsste also vielmehr lauten. "Müssen Serveradministratoren nicht hauptberufliche Mitarbeiter der Gameforge sein, denen eine Teilnahme am Spiel untersagt ist?"


    Gruss


    Das Omen