Posts by Eleven

    Taking into consideration that on our sv. is currently playing, on two accounts, the Game Administrator of the same server I ask you to amend the Bk regulation in order to ensure impartiality, as follows:


    Conflict of interest:

    1. Any member of the BK management team may have an account on the SV that he oversees.

    2. Members of the BK management team who have accounts on the servers they oversee are forbidden to assist a party in winning a war or to join an order.

    3. Members of the BK management team who have accounts on the servers must not take actions that can influence the game.

    4. Members of the BK management team who have accounts on the servers that they manage, are prohibited from disseminating information regarding the events, bans or any other information regarding activity as a member of the BK management team.


    Unfortunately, on our server the Game Administrator plays along with the order- and this isn't impartiality!


    Maeve: Content removed.

    Ok guys! If for you its ok to play in the same team with the one that manages the sv.24 (that has the power to ban an account, have info regarding the multi accounts, have info regarding the upcoming event, and he can ignore a colleague or a friend when he is cheating), then I'm very curious to tell me in what competition do you think the referee is playing also for one of the teams that are competing!? I'm asking for a similar case!

    How nice for you to join the conversation! Thank you for the answer it's a very good one in which you admit that you are on the same team with the Game Administrator! I respect your honesty and that you are not trying to avoid the topic like your friend!


    For the problem that we can find them in the regulation we should address to the ticketing system, because it is not appropriate to make threats here.


    But we don't have access to the procedures and to the regulations of the management Team and for sure none of us can say if the situation is fair! So let's see what the Management Team will say about this conflict of interest!


    I can ensure you that snake or zeuss however you wanna call him was and is playing correctly!

    Oppo, Grave and Heahmund, all three of you can you tell everyone if you play on sv. 24 along a BK Game Administrator?


    Also, you are making strategies together with the BK Game Administrator in order to win the wars!? (also got proves)



    If you guys were to be in our place and the opponent played on the same team as the one that managed the game it seems fair?


    If the BK Management will allow a BK Administrator to manage a server and to play on that particular server and more to choose a side, it will be a surprise for me.


    In the end I'm hoping that the management of the BK will intervene and remediate this conflict of interest!!!

    Hi Nik,


    Nik your very kind to answer. Just a question if you are willing to share with us (you are one of the oldest members of the team as I can remember): Do you also used to play on the server where you managed the ticket system, on the server that you administrated? It is like I'm playing a match for a football team, and I'm also the referee, don't you think? I already sent a ticket to Paso!


    Venom,

    If you are in the same situation (in our case Van helsing the Game Administrator have an account with the same name and one with the name Philcore and we have a GO playing also on our server that is mouse but he or her doesn't administrate sv 24), where the Game Administrater is playing for one of the parties it is not normal and I agree with you!


    I trust the BK team, but when we are talking about some conflict of interest and impartiality (the base of a judge/administrator/referre), it should be immediately remedied.






    Hi,


    For sure they have rules for administering this game. If they allow a player to be at the same time a game administrator it's a big mistake, beacause you cannot prove his impartiality (it's a big conflicts of interest).


    I m sorry but i cant say that is the same situation. In our case the game administrator and the player are one person and we can prove it!


    CAN ANYONE ANSWER OUR QUESTION? ANY COMMUNITY MANAGER or TEAM MANAGER!?


    I will send all the proofs and questions to the one that develops GameForge, because here i cant get an answer!

    In the Romanian 24th Server, we have a game administrator that handles the ticket system, and the same person is playing as a player in different order who is our rival. The person is Van Helsing from the Romanian team. Before him was Assus and wasn't a conflict of interest because he didn't play on this server.


    From my point of view, this server has a serious management problem because the BK team failed to ensure impartiality for this server. I will leave heare some actions that were made in the advantage of the order where Van Helsing is playing:


    1. The game administrator has unbanned two players from the order where he is playing that we know about, players that were banned for using script (we made the tickets for which they were banned; they were playing for more than 2 days straight).


    2. The player in the order whose account was unbanned knew with at least 20 days before that their account was going to be unbanned (i have print screen to prove it)


    3. The player Van Helsing is participating in wars with all his accounts (he has two) for the order for which he unbanned the accounts. (I have a print screen.).


    4. They are talking in the order that soon a third account will be unbanned by their colleague, the game administrator, Van helsing (i have a print screen)


    5. Tickets were made by our colleague that was banned for the same reason as those two that were unbanned, but in our case Van Helsing refused to apply a similar treatment.



    All this being said, can anyone help us with a regulation!? Is this situation according to the regulation? Do you consider it a fair process? Is this game administrator impartial?

    Hi. From my point of view, the procedure is not breaking the rules of Battleknigt; it is not another program that you use in order to modify something or to help to develop; it is just an image modification that the browser allows you to do (it only affects the image that you have on your monitor; it is your domain, and after that it brings it back to its original state). Even if you do not want to use this, there are times when your browser will do it automatically :)(for example, when something in a BK webpage is placed wrong, that means that such a modification has been made). So theoretically, you are doing nothing to the game because this modification never happened!


    Acording to BK Regulation:


    Exploitation and utilisation of bugs and/or programming errors is prohibited. If a user detects a bug, he is obliged to inform the responsible Gameoperator immediately. The exploitation of a bug may cause an immediate ban by the Gameteam. Bugusing in terms of errorreplication may just happen with admission of an Operator.


    My point of view: It is not a programming error because it has nothing to do with the game programming! The Software bugs are unexpected outcomes or errors in computer software. They manifest as undesired behavior, crashes, or incorrect output and stem from errors in the software development process during design, coding, or testing, and this is not the case either.


    Using a program as interface between the player and his game is prohibited. Any other form of automatically generated information generated for a group of players advantage with malicious intentions is forbidden as well. Tools can be tolerated by the administration.


    My point of view: In this case you do not use a program as interface between the player and his game, it is only the browser (all browsers have this function) that is the platform for the game.


    With all that it is not my decision to make, so I hope everything will be fine! Hope not to upset anyone.






    So here are the steps:


    1. You should edit the HTML on your computer to create an inexistent space; this change is not permanent and theoretically affects the data until you hit refresh on the page (it comes back to its original form). This way you can swap the companions.

    2. Go to the companion inventory and hit the right click (on one of the companion) and then select inspect. On the right side, it will appear a window with an element selected. Right click on the element selected and select delete element.

    3. Now you have an inexistent space (:)) and use it to change the companion.



    This procedure does not modify anything; it is just creating a space in order to change the companion. I hope that I won't break any rules; I'm just eager to help. Wish you all the best!

    I did it many times. But our GO from the Romanian BK sv. 3, told us every time that he will check, but nothing happen. I m capable to prove that he is cheating if I could be an administrator of the web page or using a program (it is very simple to prove it, i can use a tracking program that is reporting all the changes in the ranking, namely the program record every change and the hour of it and can very clearly prove that the player is cheating, because all the time between the missions/silver earned/changes will fit in the delay loop). More than that every program have a default delay that cant be overcome. I have offer to help the GO with the check routine and offer him the prove that he were playing nonstop for long intervals of time (over 15 hours) within that delay period that I was talking about.

    Thank for the reply. But i can t agree with you, because i don t think that you will bring your electronic short-time clock (for boiling eggs) on toilette, diner, or other necessary activities. I m talking about a dude that for 2 YEARS had made for more than 15h per day little missions (at every 10 minutes for the last 2 years). It is not possible and you know it and probable you are his colleague or his friend. If someone is using this new generations of new android hack the GO should know that the click or the touch have a specific radius and the click will be always be made within the radius. This kind of players are cheaters because it is not possible to keep up with the missions without a miss. I know the player that you refer to and I can assure you about the player from sv. 1 that he s a cheater, because he got banned on sv. 1, on sv. 6 and on sv. 16.

    So... In the last 2 year i have constantly asking the GO to check a player because he is playing for 2 years for more than 14 hours a day. Namely he s small missions average is 95 per day for the last 2 years. This mean that the player is behind the desktop and giving commands for at least 15 hours a day at every 10 minutes (for an example from 6 am to 9 pm). Also, his efficiency for the time played is well over 95%. So from my point of view he is cheating, but the GO just assured me that he will be checked and nothing happen. I have receive the message that according GDPR he can t give me the result. I m an expert in the human resources field and if you can t use the data to identify the person, then that mean that the data are not personal data. What are your advice? who can help me with my problem, because the GO is not helping me at all. Because if one person can cheat and affirm that he can do missions every day for 15 hours for 2 years and nobody will stop him, that mean that we all can cheat like this dude and will be no GO to stop us!


    BK, Sv. 3 Romania :cursing::cursing::cursing::cursing::cursing::cursing:

    Thank you. So that is the only way through the support system. The problem is, as you mentioned, that he will be the one that will decide if the ticket will be forwarded/reported to the community manager. I will try.

    Can u guys help me with something? How can i get someone to help us on the romanian sv. 3 on battleknight? We have there some issues with the game operator that we presume that he is letting some data leak to other players and also he is not given us the answer to our requests. How can we proceed?


    Thank you.