Posts by Heahmund

Quote from GRAVE

Quote from Heahmund

Quote from GRAVE

Quote from Heahmund

Hi, I've noticed some discussion on the forum lately about setting up a shared international server that would boost player activity.

I want to point out that BattleKnight isn’t the only Gameforge game on the market, but it’s the only one where the admins are a total embarrassment.

I know that not all the people managing the game are the same—they’re human too and have other problems or things to deal with—but I want to highlight the fact that it’s the only game where player feedback is almost completely ignored.

For example, a global merger has been requested for several years, yet nothing has been done about it, even though server activity is declining more and more. They could have followed the example of Gladiatus, where server activity went from 60–100 players online to 600–800 during an event. But hey, on Battleknight it’s more important to open new servers because they bring in money—the biggest nonsense. A global merger would require a major investment from some of us.

Why? Because then the game would liven up, and we’d see who’s cut out to stay and who’s just a poser who quits after the first 10–20 consecutive attacks.

Most servers are struggling to survive with 10–50 active players, lots of clone accounts, and that’s about it, but with a global merger, the number of players would increase considerably.

Each server at its own speed: x5 with x5, x10 with x10, normal speed with normal speed.

I know that what we want as players is impossible or hard to achieve, but if others have managed it, I don’t see why it can’t work here too.

The problem with useless events and the scarcity of good ones—instead of having two events a month that are just a joke, it would be better to implement mini-events on weekends and have one at the end of every month that encourages players to invest money in rubies, and the game to benefit from the money generated by ruby purchases—I think it’s a win-win for everyone.

Daily login bonus: every browser game has a daily login bonus, whether it’s for 5 or 7 days. The rewards aren’t spectacular, but they help keep players engaged. An experience bonus, one ruby, two rubies—at the end of 7 consecutive days, you get something from the realm for 3–5 days. It’s not hard; you just have to want to do it, which seems to be completely missing from the administrators’ minds here.

I’m sure what I said above might be offensive to some of you; I’m sorry to say this, but I don’t care. We’ll end up being the last browser game where a global merger doesn’t happen because of the carelessness shown by those in charge of the game.

I’d like those responding to stick to the topic of this thread and not veer off again into other topics that have been discussed for months on end.

Display More

My dear friend,Alex,if you are the Heahmund that i know.....my questions for you is....

First of all,if you are the Heahmund i know,how is family? old ones?

Then.......

How much money did you invested in this game?

How many gems do you spend in a month?

When asking for a global surge,do you really know what will do to the game? or you're just speaking in the name of that Snake Eyes and his friends that cheated for years ,so them to be in the same page with ALL of the people?

Display More

Hi Luchian, the family is doing well, and my father is the same as you know—he’s just getting by day to day. I hope everything is going well for you, too.

To answer your first question, over the course of a year I’ve invested about 2,000–2,500 euros; you can’t clear 50 levels with just 100 rubies.

In a month I spend between 2,000 and 3,000 rubies, depending on how much free time I have to play.

What will this do for the game? Only good things, because it will increase activity. I know it’ll be hard for some to keep up when they’re under attack every hour, but that’s why there are protections and the Bastion, right?

I wouldn’t want to get into a debate about cheaters, because even in ROMA, as you know all too well, there have been and still are players who use programs—I even have proof if you’re interested

Display More

As i was sayin.......well that is a surprise Alex......

Are you talking about the same account from the romanian server?

Because last time we spoke,in October,you said that you had to gave up your account for a substantial amount of money that you need for a health problem that you had in your family,unfortunately......i do not know whom you sell it,but please,be honest !

Display More

Yes, the last time we spoke, I told you I was going to sell the account for a good amount of money, but fate decided that I wouldn’t have to give it away and that I’d keep it. After our last conversation, I gave the account to a friend who wanted to see what the game was like; he didn’t really like it, so the account came back to me, which led me to start playing again.

You probably want to know why I didn’t go back to ROMA—because everyone there is only out for themselves, and no one has the authority to express their point of view. When a decision needs to be made, it’s not made collectively; everyone just does whatever they want.

I don’t know what you’re trying to prove by the fact that I said I’m selling the account—probably to ban it—but you already have Van on your team, who’s part of the game’s admin staff; he can confirm that only my IP has been logged into the account recently.

Quote from Maeve

Hi

First of all, thank you for your suggestions. However, there are a few points I would like to clarify from a team perspective.

Regarding merges, new events, and new content in general: I understand that many of you are asking for this, and it is completely understandable. The reality, however, is that the game is based on very old and outdated code. Any modification of certain parameters or the addition of new content often causes parts of the system to break or stop functioning properly. This could be addressed with a sufficient number of developers and programmers, but as everyone is aware, the level of investment available is limited. That said, some important updates have been discussed internally, which I believe could improve the current situation of the game. I cannot share further details, but things are not without hope. Patience is appreciated

Regarding team members and your suggestions: we do not have decision-making power over these matters. Each responsible person within the community, whether a game admin or forum admin, is in charge of forwarding suggestions and feedback to the community manager, who then passes them on to the development team. It is there where feasibility and potential impact are evaluated. Additionally, even if a suggestion is technically feasible, it may still not be implementable due to the limitations mentioned in the first point.

Display More

Good evening, you say the game is outdated and can’t be modified. It’s interesting how another game (Gladiatus), released in 2007, managed to change its code and transition to global fusion, but Battleknight can’t—though I tend to think it’s just a matter of not wanting to!

"The level of investment available is limited."—No, seriously? How can you say that when there are dozens of players from all communities—if not a few hundred of us—who regularly purchase rubies, ranging from £50 to £1,000 a month, and you say the investment limit is limited? I can’t believe that, because there are plenty of people putting money in.

For years, people have been asking for new mission locations based on level, and not even that has been possible. There are many differences between Battleknight and similar games—it’s possible there, but not here.

Quote from GRAVE

Quote from Heahmund

Hi, I've noticed some discussion on the forum lately about setting up a shared international server that would boost player activity.

I want to point out that BattleKnight isn’t the only Gameforge game on the market, but it’s the only one where the admins are a total embarrassment.

I know that not all the people managing the game are the same—they’re human too and have other problems or things to deal with—but I want to highlight the fact that it’s the only game where player feedback is almost completely ignored.

For example, a global merger has been requested for several years, yet nothing has been done about it, even though server activity is declining more and more. They could have followed the example of Gladiatus, where server activity went from 60–100 players online to 600–800 during an event. But hey, on Battleknight it’s more important to open new servers because they bring in money—the biggest nonsense. A global merger would require a major investment from some of us.

Why? Because then the game would liven up, and we’d see who’s cut out to stay and who’s just a poser who quits after the first 10–20 consecutive attacks.

Most servers are struggling to survive with 10–50 active players, lots of clone accounts, and that’s about it, but with a global merger, the number of players would increase considerably.

Each server at its own speed: x5 with x5, x10 with x10, normal speed with normal speed.

I know that what we want as players is impossible or hard to achieve, but if others have managed it, I don’t see why it can’t work here too.

The problem with useless events and the scarcity of good ones—instead of having two events a month that are just a joke, it would be better to implement mini-events on weekends and have one at the end of every month that encourages players to invest money in rubies, and the game to benefit from the money generated by ruby purchases—I think it’s a win-win for everyone.

Daily login bonus: every browser game has a daily login bonus, whether it’s for 5 or 7 days. The rewards aren’t spectacular, but they help keep players engaged. An experience bonus, one ruby, two rubies—at the end of 7 consecutive days, you get something from the realm for 3–5 days. It’s not hard; you just have to want to do it, which seems to be completely missing from the administrators’ minds here.

I’m sure what I said above might be offensive to some of you; I’m sorry to say this, but I don’t care. We’ll end up being the last browser game where a global merger doesn’t happen because of the carelessness shown by those in charge of the game.

I’d like those responding to stick to the topic of this thread and not veer off again into other topics that have been discussed for months on end.

Display More

My dear friend,Alex,if you are the Heahmund that i know.....my questions for you is....

First of all,if you are the Heahmund i know,how is family? old ones?

Then.......

How much money did you invested in this game?

How many gems do you spend in a month?

When asking for a global surge,do you really know what will do to the game? or you're just speaking in the name of that Snake Eyes and his friends that cheated for years ,so them to be in the same page with ALL of the people?

Display More

Hi Luchian, the family is doing well, and my father is the same as you know—he’s just getting by day to day. I hope everything is going well for you, too.

To answer your first question, over the course of a year I’ve invested about 2,000–2,500 euros; you can’t clear 50 levels with just 100 rubies.

In a month I spend between 2,000 and 3,000 rubies, depending on how much free time I have to play.

What will this do for the game? Only good things, because it will increase activity. I know it’ll be hard for some to keep up when they’re under attack every hour, but that’s why there are protections and the Bastion, right?

I wouldn’t want to get into a debate about cheaters, because even in ROMA, as you know all too well, there have been and still are players who use programs—I even have proof if you’re interested

1. "Suggestions from players should only be passed to Gameforge by admins not carried out by them."

Well said, this should be shared more widely, but do you see anything happening in that direction?

I’m not saying there haven’t been small improvements over the years, but never any major ones with a substantial impact.

When I say we should stick to the topic, I mean we shouldn’t veer off from global fusion to ways of combating cheaters; I hope I’ve made myself clear on that point.

2. "

I'm not sure that the things you are complaining about are the fault of the admins on this occasion or even within their powers."

You say it’s not their fault and that it’s beyond their control, but I disagree—they’re the ones primarily to blame when it comes to the things we players ask for and nothing ever happens about it.

They should be on our side when it comes to improving the game, taking our wishes into account, within reason.

If I'm wrong, please let me know where.

Hi, I've noticed some discussion on the forum lately about setting up a shared international server that would boost player activity.

I want to point out that BattleKnight isn’t the only Gameforge game on the market, but it’s the only one where the admins are a total embarrassment.

I know that not all the people managing the game are the same—they’re human too and have other problems or things to deal with—but I want to highlight the fact that it’s the only game where player feedback is almost completely ignored.

For example, a global merger has been requested for several years, yet nothing has been done about it, even though server activity is declining more and more. They could have followed the example of Gladiatus, where server activity went from 60–100 players online to 600–800 during an event. But hey, on Battleknight it’s more important to open new servers because they bring in money—the biggest nonsense. A global merger would require a major investment from some of us.

Why? Because then the game would liven up, and we’d see who’s cut out to stay and who’s just a poser who quits after the first 10–20 consecutive attacks.

Most servers are struggling to survive with 10–50 active players, lots of clone accounts, and that’s about it, but with a global merger, the number of players would increase considerably.

Each server at its own speed: x5 with x5, x10 with x10, normal speed with normal speed.

I know that what we want as players is impossible or hard to achieve, but if others have managed it, I don’t see why it can’t work here too.

The problem with useless events and the scarcity of good ones—instead of having two events a month that are just a joke, it would be better to implement mini-events on weekends and have one at the end of every month that encourages players to invest money in rubies, and the game to benefit from the money generated by ruby purchases—I think it’s a win-win for everyone.

Daily login bonus: every browser game has a daily login bonus, whether it’s for 5 or 7 days. The rewards aren’t spectacular, but they help keep players engaged. An experience bonus, one ruby, two rubies—at the end of 7 consecutive days, you get something from the realm for 3–5 days. It’s not hard; you just have to want to do it, which seems to be completely missing from the administrators’ minds here.

I’m sure what I said above might be offensive to some of you; I’m sorry to say this, but I don’t care. We’ll end up being the last browser game where a global merger doesn’t happen because of the carelessness shown by those in charge of the game.

I’d like those responding to stick to the topic of this thread and not veer off again into other topics that have been discussed for months on end.

Quote from Malko

Quote from Heahmund

Quote from Sigmud

Quote from Malko

Salut Paso,

Înțelegem că nu a fost vina jucătorilor și că a fost o eroare din partea voastră, dar situația afectează în continuare echilibrul pe s24-ro. Jucătorul de pe locul 2, lDuke, beneficiază în continuarea acestor obiecte și obține un avantaj clar.

Ați putea, vă rog, să nu oferiți un interval de timp mai concret pentru rezolvarea acestei probleme? În acest moment, impactul este semnificativ și ar fi important să știm când va fi corectată situația.

Nu este mai saturat?

jucați voi singuri

Lasa-i , cand sa facut acida 400% si veneau 3-4 atacuri pe snake ca sa il zoneze si luau si ei maruntis erau cei mai bucurosi, acum cand si-o fura pe cocoasa striga hotul, bine ca atunci taceau ca si cacatul in porumb.

Display More

Voi sunteti singuri care abuzati de scrituri si bug-uri. SNAKE BANAT PTR BOOTI,DE 2-3 ORI,LA URMAT SI NOTORIUS ..

Acum ganicutzu profita de bug-ul cu itemele si se crede zmeu.

Plangeti ca va bate lvl 288,daca omul isi permite sa cheltuie 20-30k rubine pe vraci se vad si urma.
Tu ai uitat cand il atacai pe snake cand era banat si luai arginti ? inainte de unificarea serverelor..

Concluzia este ca voi fara bug-uri si booti sunteti 0. Nu degeaba sunteti melci(lmx)

Display More

Dragul de tine cum le stii tu pe toate, dar le stii prost , eu inainte de fuziune nu i-am dat niciun atac lui snake cand a fost banat. Nu ma crezi ? E aici si iti poate confirma, eu nu sunt gunoi ca altii din ordinul vostru

Noi suntem singurii care folosim scripturi ? Sa ne aducem aminte ca si Caius tot de asta a fost banat ? Sa ti arat dovada cand Titan admite si confirma faptul ca foloseste ? Nu mai te baga in discutii pe care nu le poti duce pana la final si daca vrei lista cu cei care folosesc scripturi de la voi poate continua, asa ca baga mare si lasa gargara.

Cand vrei tu sau oricine de la voi, pornim intr o zi de la 8 si jucam pana la 20-22 si ne trimitem mesaje la fiecare misiune sa vedem cine foloseste script sau nu, ca voi sunteti egali cu 0 si fara scripturi si donatii nu sunteti in stare de nimic.

Quote from Sigmud

Quote from Malko

Hello Paso,

We understand that this wasn’t the players’ fault and that it was an error on your side, but the situation is still affecting the balance on s24-ro. The player in 2nd place, lDuke, is still benefiting from these items and gaining a clear advantage.

Could you please provide a more concrete timeframe for when this issue will be resolved? At the moment, the impact is significant and it would be important for us to know when the situation will be corrected.

nu va mai saturati?

jucati voi singuri

Lasa-i , cand s a facut acida 400% si veneau 3-4 atacuri pe snake ca sa il zoneze si luau si ei maruntis erau cei mai bucurosi, acum cand si-o fura pe cocoasa striga hotul, bine ca atunci taceau ca si cacatul in porumb.

Let s go and play minecraft , atleast there you can play however you want or gladiatus , because there you have atleast 3-5 events per month, not like here, 1 per month and it s a shitty event.

They will be removed when the game administrators will provide other items in exchange of those, the amount of silver and rubies spent on them, and the amount of rubies spent for the change of the merchant.

Because it s easy to say, we will refund the silver and the rubies, but the rest of the rubies ? Let s be honest it s not the player fault that the game is full of bugs , and to be honest neither do you or I would agree to lose 100-200 for merchants and not getting them back, 100-200 rubies are few euros that you will never see them back .

Quote from Undecim (Eleven)

Dear Van Helsing,

I appreciate your response. All we want is for the fight to be fair and for you to remain neutral—not take sides! Because, in our opinion, you are playing along them! We don't mind if you stay neutral and don't play the game with them. We obtained information about the unbanned accounts from your colleagues, the majority of whom were from Prometeu, including images from the order chat.

We only want a fair game, so please don't take it personally! You are undoubtedly a decent person, yet your first-roma colleagues disparage you through their rumours.

About the picture that was previously shared along with the WhatsApp discussion:

1. Please take actions beacuse there was a lot of personal data that was operated (pictures of some people)!

2. Anyone can do a whatsapp conversation with someone and trow it here!! It is not nice to lie in this maner! (I can put anyone in connection with the one that had the account in order to get the REAL details)

Wish you all the best!

Display More

My dear little friend , Prometeu here , i would like to see these photos that you are talking about but for sure i know what are you talking about and for sure that's not a reason to give names randomly here like you said few minutes ago on a mobile app

For now just look in your yard.

Have a nice day all of you !

The hardcore way, i don t think so mate, if you " I play well over 100 accounts" it means that you really don t know about the way to play this game, why spending time on 100 accounts when you can play on 1 and be the best with that one ? Just keep living in your fantasy world where everyone should accept the inevitable death of this game and let us , the rest to hope at a bright future of this game. You said there that most of us play with a lot of accounts, i don t know why should someone focus on more than 1 or 2 accounts , make my day and teach me which are the benefits having 100 accounts Have a nice week mate.

Quote from kmtanoth

Great life lessons, guys ... LOL

I only play this game to pass some free time, I like winning, and I hate competition, especially the kind that buys tons of rubies to get an advantage. I do not buy rubies, so I rely on rubies from tournaments, and it is working beautifully by now.

There is really not much more to say, you just don't get it if you're playing only a handful of accounts like I imagine most of you do. I play well over 100 accounts, and I'd like to continue to do so.

Siroge:

Your attempted insult of calling me a "coward" is just ludicrous. What has playing smart and not wanting to spend money on an essentially dead game got to do with being a "coward"? LOL ...

Heahmund:

Who cares what the game was like 10, 15 years ago? No server mergers can bring those apparently "golden days" back. Start living in the present.

And for your information: I have been down that road (spending rubies on missions) the hardcore way ... until I realized it's just not worth it, and there is a better way to enjoy the game ... for free

Display More

My friend, it seems that you didn t play 10 years ago this game, when the activity was more higher than now. if you really don t want the merge, find a server without active players and stay there and fight with yourself, let the rest of us enjoy this game till we can. The number of active players is reducing year by year and the games does not seem to improve, the same events, the same players everyday .let the merge come and have more rivals, let the game shine again for us who wnjoy playing this. If you are so selfish on a game like this, i don t want to know how selfish are you in real life. If the big problem is that there are others that can beat you , so be it, you should spend that rubies on missions to get better

Quote from kmtanoth

Quote from Siroge

Imagine that your argument for not wanting a merger and therefore more activity is that you might no longer be "the best" in tournaments.

What a selfish excuse

I want activity, I want there to be a war of orders, I want to have real rivals in the tournaments and if someone in my rank appears who is better than me, then I will find a way to beat him and defeat him.

What's wrong with being selfish in a game like this? Of course I want what's best for ME, not for some anonymous other players who I don't even really know, let alone care about.

And about your desire to meet "real rivals in the tournaments": Believe me, you'll meet rivals that are so much better than you that you can't beat them in years, if ever .. and you'll grow tired of losing all the time real soon ... so better be careful what you wish for

And the "war of orders" that you're so keen about? You do realize that there is a limited number of good castles on the BK map, right? What happens when suddenly 20 large orders compete for a handful of good castles? I'll tell you what happens: The end of "cheaper skilling days" for many many knights.

No no, this whole server merging is a really stupid idea, that would leave many dedicated players out in the cold, destroying everything they carefully build up over the years. I sincerely hope it never happens.

Display More

Quote from Venom

That would be ideal for all players.. Connect first by country and see how it works.

Let them make from the first time global, don t interrupt them :))

Salut, prin intermediul ticketelor e cam degeaba sa incerci sa contactezi un membru al staff-ului, mai ales pe comunitatea ro, in ce priveste fuziunea, nu te astepta sa fie prea curand, au ales sa o faca prima oara pe bitefight , ceea ce inseamna ca bk ramane pe ultimul loc, iar daca o sa fie vreuna in viitorul apropiat macar sa o faca la fel ca cea de pe gladiatus , unde sa fuzioneze toate serverele , la nivel global, nu la nivel de comunitate cum o sa faca pe bitefight, pentru ca pana la urma urmei, aceeasi jucatori de sunt pe s3 sunt si pe s6 sau mai stiu eu ce servere.

Revenind la ceea ce ai scris mai sus, mai bine intri pe discord si faci o sesizare ca mai repede ii gasesti acolo activi, decat aici sau prin intermediul support, iar referitor la problema, o sa il baneze candva, dar mai asteapta sa le bage cateva sute de e in cont.

971

So it's not really a translation problem.

More than likely to be a translation error, but a lot of us waited that -50% mission time

Hello and sorry for the wrong content, but here is the official statement on the server.

So perhaps that - 50% mission time should be - 50% travel time ?

Regele a facut o declaratie!

Regele a adoptat urmatoarele reguli pana la 28.01.2024 12:00:

• -50% timp misiune
• +50% profit argint in misiuni
• -50% cost argint pentru puncte atribute
• +50% puncte de regenerare
• 25% sansa 2 de rubine in misiune

And here is the translation for it

Hello again, I don't know but is so difficult to do one job on this game ? Another event with -50% mission time, but it doesn' t work . Why putting up something that doesn't add up ?