Posts by Camelot

    That is not the clever reversal you seem to think it is. @Sir Lion Steak

    There is one important difference: I am not the one making public forum posts complaining about this behaviour while tolerating the exact same thing when it benefits my own side.

    If you have evidence that somebody in my order is botting or using multiple accounts, report them. I have never argued that rule-breaking is acceptable simply because it benefits my side.

    But none of your accusations change the point I made: you are publicly outraged about suspicious level 3 accounts being used to influence a castle fight on Server 43 while knowingly tolerating remarkably similar behaviour from your own guildmate on Server 50.

    Pointing at other alleged rule-breakers does not make your own double standard disappear. It just confirms that your objection is not really about the behaviour itself....it is about whether you benefit from it.

    Come on, Lion Steak. Stop arguing like a sulking child who got caught in his own double standards. I thought you were a grown man in your fifties, not someone whose best response is ā€œno, youā€ followed by copy and paste of my closing sentence.
    So yes, report every bot, multi-account and artificially created order you can prove. Just remember to include the ones helping you.

    Feel free to DM me, if you wanna discuss this further.

    Claes van Campen I am sorry, but I had to post this final response. I will not continue participating in this topic.

    Feel free to report me for going off-topic. I accept the consequences.


    Then put on a clown nose and report yourself and your guildmate, who is doing the exact same thing on UK Server 50.

    It is honestly impressive how you can come to the forum and complain about other players while doing or at least knowingly tolerating the exact same behaviour on another server.

    I guess everything is perfectly fine as long as you are sitting comfortably in the King’s Castle and benefiting from it. But the moment somebody else does the same thing and you are the one being disadvantaged, suddenly it becomes a huge problem.

    The hypocrisy and lack of self-awareness are almost comical.

    Thank you for the response Maeve but let’s be absolutely honest here: this post is nothing more than a textbook exercise in shifting blame and dodging accountability.


    1. "We do the best we can with the tools available " While it is true that recruiting is difficult, being a volunteer does not grant a lifetime immunity pass from basic responsibility. If the current team is understaffed, inactive, or lacks the tools to function, that is a structural failure that should have been escalated to Gameforge months, if not years ago. If you accept a role as an administrator, you accept the responsibility that comes with it. If the tools are broken or not enough and the workload is unmanageable, keeping silent and letting tickets rot for weeks is the worst possible approach.

    2."Recruiting new team members is far more difficult than it seems"

    Let’s call this what it is: a myth. How can you complain about a lack of volunteers when there hasn't been a visible, open application phase for Game Administrators in ages? There may be 1-2 posts but somewhere deep in the archive where no one finds or see it. You cannot claim nobody wants to do the job when you aren't even opening the doors or make the approach. There is absolutely no effort made to recruit, no announcements, and zero incentives created to attract new game admins.

    2. "Volunteers have families now / Priorities change" We completely respect everyone's personal life, families, and changing priorities. However, this actually disproves your own point. If an administrator no longer has the time or the passion to dedicate to the game, the correct and honorable move is to step down, like other previous team members did before or were forced to. Holding onto a title and a position while being completely inactive helps absolutely no one it only blocks the path for potential new people and leaves the community stranded and frustrated, because we see you all holding that "title".


    3. "Community Managers are overworked and manage multiple games" This is a corporate excuse, not a player problem. Players pay real money for Rubies and microtransactions in this game. Gameforge is a commercial company, not a charity. The moment a company continues to monetize a game while refusing to staff it properly, it becomes a scam. Defending the CMs by saying "they are busy with other games" is essentially admitting to the community that BattleKnight is being left to die while still collecting our money.


    4. "Don't criticize team members who post announcements while support is ignored"

    You argue that we shouldn't criticize team members who post announcements because "different roles have different responsibilities." From a player’s perspective, this is just bureaucratic nonsense. When the ship is sinking, it doesn't matter which sailor is responsible for the deck and which for the kitchen everyone needs to grab a bucket.

    If the players have problems or issues reported and support tickets are rotting for weeks, having Board Admins happily push event announcements to keep players spending money while Game Admins are completely "missing in action" looks incredibly hypocritical. If the team is as small and desperate as you claim, these strict role separations shouldn't exist anymore. Cross-train your staff, help each other out, and clear the support backlog instead of hiding behind team titles while the community burns.


    5. "The solution is a global merge like Gladiatus" While a global merge is indeed a great technical solution, using it as a future excuse for current support negligence is unacceptable. A merge requires development time and corporate decisions that might take months or may never happen at all. What we need is support now, not a hypothetical 'savior' in the distant future.



    Final thoughts: We don't want excuses, we want execution. If Gameforge and the current volunteer team can no longer maintain basic customer service, then be honest and close the servers. But stop taking our money or offer microtransactions while telling us to "be patient" because life got in the way. And please, save yourself the argument that "nobody is forced to spend money." That is a cheap defense. Gameforge runs a commercial business, and BattleKnight is designed to promote microtransactions. The moment you offer a paid service, whether optional or not, you are making a financial deal with the player base. You cannot pocket the money from premium sales while providing zero customer support and letting game-breaking issues rot. Do the job, pressure Gameforge for real support, or step aside.



    [Mic drop] šŸŽ¤

    Maeve


    I do not think anyone is denying that maintaining a nearly 20-year-old game comes with technical challenges. Legacy systems being deeply interconnected is completely understandable.

    What many players struggle with, however, is that these explanations have been repeated for years while the practical outcome has remained largely the same: very limited visible development despite continued monetisation and a small but still active player base that continues to financially support the game.

    At some point, ā€œthe code is old and complicatedā€ stops sounding like an explanation and starts sounding like a permanent justification for why meaningful investment will never happen.

    Because realistically, old architecture itself is not really the core issue. Every long-running software project accumulates technical debt over time. The real question is usually whether enough development resources are being allocated to gradually modernise, refactor, or work around those limitations.

    I also think the argument about limited resources unintentionally raises another question:

    If the game is still profitable enough to continue active monetisation after all these years, why does it seemingly not justify allocating enough development capacity to deliver even moderate long-term improvements?

    That is ultimately where much of the skepticism comes from.

    Nobody expects miracles, nor does anyone believe changes are ā€œjust easy.ā€ But after hearing variations of the same explanation for years, it becomes increasingly difficult not to interpret the situation as the game being maintained operationally and monetarily, while larger technical investment is simply no longer considered worthwhile internally.

    And honestly, a direct statement such as:

    ā€œBattleKnight currently is not considered a priority project for larger development investmentsā€

    would probably feel more transparent than repeatedly framing the situation primarily around technical difficulty.

    Because from a community perspective, the issue increasingly feels less like ā€œcannotā€ and more like ā€œwill not.ā€

    Great article! t’s a bit unfortunate that you revealed the "secret tactic" with the training room. That was always one of those things that separated casual players from the really good ones, or the clever players from the less observant. Well, after all these years, I guess everyone knows now. šŸ˜„

    Also, the amount of rubies you receive at the end of the event does not depend on how many potions you drink, but rather on how many pages you have in the book "The Legacy" (World → The Legacy)

    • The 3 most annoying bugs or issues you are currently experiencing
      1. Marketplace armor, weapons and rings are giving only shit out, since the update 4.x.x.
      2. Multiaccount abusing (create dead lvl 3 accounts) to fill orders and capture/block castles. (Pls bann people away who abuse multi accounting, I can remember Speedbreaker banned alot people back in the days for that, start doing it again!)
      3. Tournaments, take forever to start if you are alone in your levelrange. Give more(better) rewards or speed up the joining black knights
    • 3 features you would like to see added (can also be ideas for new events)
      1. more item sets, that you also can aquire via marketplace
      2. people should be able to choose at Dragon event start if they want to obtain the Gryphon- or Dragonset and give the low level players the nightwalker set. Same for the easter event with the egg, let us choose the companion.
      3. bigger HP potions (500 max hp for a knight with 15k hp is a joke)
    • 3 small changes that could improve your daily gaming experience
      1.Mobile App for the game!
      2.better Visibility of the Compare function
      3. More room for inventory

    All your constant yapping in every thread won’t change a single thing. None of this was decided by the Game Operators or moderators. They have zero control over event timings, merchant appearances, or how long anything stays active. These decisions come from above, not from the people you keep blaming. We are all affected by the same rules and timing...nobody gets special treatment.


    And honestly, your other rant posts are just as pointless. You already got a 2-week timeout for offending the moderators and operators, that alone should’ve shown you that this approach leads absolutely nowhere.


    There are no secret channels, no hidden lever, and no magical feedback route. It is what it is. Spamming the forum won’t bring back badges, won’t change decisions, and won’t fix anything.


    Yes, you can talk here if you want ... you have ā€œfree speechā€ in the forum. Nobody is denying that. But free speech doesn’t make your posts meaningful, productive, or impactful. Everyone else is equally free to point out that it’s pointless noise that changes nothing.


    So if you’re genuinely this unhappy with the game, maybe it’s time to stop shouting into the void and go play something else instead.

    Could you please apply a hotfix for the bug with HP Potions? Currently, if you're at 1 HP, you can't use any potions at all and are forced to wait until :58 every hour (e.g., 16:58, 17:58, etc.) when health regeneration kicks in. For me this a critical bug....

    Interestingly, the 100% potion that costs 10 Rubies can still be used in this situation....I wonder why

    Is anyone else having issues on the EN servers using potions from this bar? I can’t use them when I’m at 1 HP ...the website just refreshes and nothing happens. I've already cleared my entire browser cache and relogged.



    I am using Google Chrome latetest version.

    Ruriksson du sprichst mir aus der Seele. Ich kann mich allen deiner Punkte anschließen.



    @ Zhirelia "

    BattleKnight ist kein fertiges Spiel in der Hinsicht, dass man nicht mehr daran arbeitet und es nur noch potenzielle Kunden zum Einmalkauf anbietet.

    Da man aber daran arbeitet, passieren nun mal Bugs. Klar, diese sollten natürlich dann auch gefixt werden. "




    Du setzt uns gerne auch auf ein falsches Pferd: Natürlich ist das Spiel nur noch zum Einmalkauf ausgerichtet, warum werden sonst alle 3 Monate mit einem Scheduler ein neuer Server eröffnet und man sieht neue Spieler die Level 3 komplette Shoprüstung haben und sich dann wundern warum sie verlieren und anschließen nie wieder spielen. Es wird sogar Werbung extra auf den sozialen Medien geschaltet wenn ein neuer Server aufmacht um genau diese Kunden abzugreifen.

    Wann wurde denn mal daran gearbeitet? Hast du Change Logs? Ja es war bestimmt viel Arbeit diese Serverzusammenlegung zu machen, aber Ich habe Bugs sowohl im Ticketsystem als auch hier im Forum vor 4 Jahre gemeldet und es wurde mir immer gesagt, es wurde gemeldet und weitergegeben. Ich habe es gefühlt jedem zweiten CoMa gezeigt welche Bugs die ich kenne im Spiel existieren. Aber irgendwie kommt mir das so vor, als wäre da ein schwarzes Loch am Ende der Meldekette. Das der Bug mit dem Ordenskrieg gefixt wurde ist zwar schön, aber was ist mit den anderen Bugs?
    Wenn eine Zahlungsmethode mal nicht funktioniert wird sofort eine Serverwartung gemacht, aber wenn ein Fragezeichen in den Nachrichten zu Problemen führt und die interne Kommunikation nach einem Servermerge stört, welches aufgrund von Basic-HTML Kenntnissen gefixt werden kann(Beschädigte htaccess-Datei oder Falsche Dateiberechtigungen) , dann wird wieder geschwiegen.